Marking Criteria for Planning and Evaluative Commentary
This assignment is marked out of 20. Level 4 (16–20 marks) • There is excellent research into similar media texts. • There is excellent planning, with clear evidence of organised use of time. • There is excellent reference to the ways the production is aimed at a target audience. • There is an excellent understanding of the ways in which media language has been used to construct representation. • There is an excellent understanding of the ways in which generic codes and conventions have been used to construct representation. • The evaluation is excellent, with a clear sense of reflection on the work. • There is an accurate command of medium-specific terminology. Level 3 (11–15 marks) • There is proficient research into similar media texts. • There is proficient planning, with evidence of organised use of time. • There is proficient reference to the ways the production is aimed at a target audience. • There is proficient understanding of the ways in which media language has been used to construct representation. • There is proficient understanding of the ways in which generic codes and conventions have been used to construct representation. • The evaluation is proficient, with a sound sense of reflection on the work. • There is a proficient grasp of medium-specific terminology. Level 2 (6–10 marks) • There is basic evidence of research. • There is basic evidence of planning. • There is basic reference to a target audience. • There is basic understanding of the ways in which media language has been used to construct representation. • There is basic understanding of the ways in which generic codes and conventions have been used to construct representation. • The evaluation of the finished media text is mainly descriptive, but there may be basic reflection on the work. • There is a basic grasp of medium-specific terminology. Level 1 (1–5 marks) • There is minimal evidence of research. • There is minimal evidence of planning. • There is minimal reference to a target audience. • There is minimal understanding of the ways in which media language has been used to construct representation. • There is minimal understanding of the ways in which generic codes and conventions have been used to construct representation. • There is minimal evaluation of the finished media text. • There is minimal use of medium-specific terminology. 0 marks = no response or no response worthy of credit |
|
My Site |
POSTERS MARK SCHEME |